<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (5) TMI 10 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29508</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta addressed a penalty order cancellation under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1963-64. Discrepancies in declared income and assessed income, related to cash credits and loans, were at issue. The Tribunal emphasized the assessee&#039;s right to challenge admissions and prove credit genuineness, criticizing the lack of creditor summoning by the IAC. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the revenue&#039;s burden to prove income concealment and the assessee&#039;s right to present evidence. The judgment favored the assessee, stressing fair defense opportunities and thorough examination in penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:49:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (5) TMI 10 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29508</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta addressed a penalty order cancellation under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1963-64. Discrepancies in declared income and assessed income, related to cash credits and loans, were at issue. The Tribunal emphasized the assessee&#039;s right to challenge admissions and prove credit genuineness, criticizing the lack of creditor summoning by the IAC. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the revenue&#039;s burden to prove income concealment and the assessee&#039;s right to present evidence. The judgment favored the assessee, stressing fair defense opportunities and thorough examination in penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>