https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425049 A general works contractor sought mandamus to rectify errors in GSTR-1 forms for November 2018 and August 2019, which caused incorrect classification of outward supplies resulting in recipient's short payment. Despite representation to the Assistant Commissioner State GST, no decision was communicated. The HC disposed of the petition by directing the Assistant Commissioner to consider the petitioner's representation, provide a reasoned order after hearing, and communicate the decision within four weeks. The petitioner was granted opportunity to raise factual and legal issues during the hearing. No costs were imposed. en-us Tue, 12 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Apr 2025 11:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425049 A general works contractor sought mandamus to rectify errors in GSTR-1 forms for November 2018 and August 2019, which caused incorrect classification of outward supplies resulting in recipient's short payment. Despite representation to the Assistant Commissioner State GST, no decision was communicated. The HC disposed of the petition by directing the Assistant Commissioner to consider the petitioner's representation, provide a reasoned order after hearing, and communicate the decision within four weeks. The petitioner was granted opportunity to raise factual and legal issues during the hearing. No costs were imposed. Case-Laws GST Tue, 12 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425049