<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 577 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425022</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the Company Petition, ruling that the application by an unregistered partnership firm against a Corporate Debtor was permissible under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. However, the tribunal found that a pre-existing dispute existed between the parties, preventing the commencement of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 08:52:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 577 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425022</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the Company Petition, ruling that the application by an unregistered partnership firm against a Corporate Debtor was permissible under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. However, the tribunal found that a pre-existing dispute existed between the parties, preventing the commencement of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>