https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425021 In insolvency proceedings, a claimant cannot compel admission of disputed reimbursement and work-payment claims on bare assertion alone. The Tribunal held that the Resolution Professional was justified in acting only on the documents on record, and that summary jurisdiction could not be used to crystallise claims unsupported by evidence. Because the applicant failed to furnish the required supporting records for the claimed service tax reimbursement and balance work payment, the request for directions to admit those amounts failed. en-us Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Jul 2022 08:52:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425021 In insolvency proceedings, a claimant cannot compel admission of disputed reimbursement and work-payment claims on bare assertion alone. The Tribunal held that the Resolution Professional was justified in acting only on the documents on record, and that summary jurisdiction could not be used to crystallise claims unsupported by evidence. Because the applicant failed to furnish the required supporting records for the claimed service tax reimbursement and balance work payment, the request for directions to admit those amounts failed. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425021