<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1631 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303313</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the CIT(A) for a de-novo examination regarding the correct assessment year for taxing capital gains, inclusion of common area and undivided land in capital gains computation, and implications of the development agreement on capital gains tax. The appeal filed by the revenue was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 20:41:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1631 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303313</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the CIT(A) for a de-novo examination regarding the correct assessment year for taxing capital gains, inclusion of common area and undivided land in capital gains computation, and implications of the development agreement on capital gains tax. The appeal filed by the revenue was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>