<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1981 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303306</link>
    <description>The Court found the parties in contempt for failing to comply with a tribunal order to return bank guarantees. The Court reiterated the cancellation of the bank guarantees and directed the Department of Telecommunications to refund a specific sum of money. The judgment emphasized that the bank guarantees cannot be used for any purpose and are considered cancelled, pending the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 07:53:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1981 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303306</link>
      <description>The Court found the parties in contempt for failing to comply with a tribunal order to return bank guarantees. The Court reiterated the cancellation of the bank guarantees and directed the Department of Telecommunications to refund a specific sum of money. The judgment emphasized that the bank guarantees cannot be used for any purpose and are considered cancelled, pending the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>