<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 562 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425007</link>
    <description>AAR held that APIIC is a government entity as Andhra Pradesh government holds 100% shareholding through nominees. The construction work undertaken by applicant for APIIC was deemed business-oriented promotional activity, not eligible for concessional 12% GST rate under Notification 24/2017. The contract was classified as composite supply of works contract under SAC 9954, attracting 18% GST (9% CGST + 9% SGST) under Notification 11/2017 instead of the concessional rate sought by applicant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 562 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425007</link>
      <description>AAR held that APIIC is a government entity as Andhra Pradesh government holds 100% shareholding through nominees. The construction work undertaken by applicant for APIIC was deemed business-oriented promotional activity, not eligible for concessional 12% GST rate under Notification 24/2017. The contract was classified as composite supply of works contract under SAC 9954, attracting 18% GST (9% CGST + 9% SGST) under Notification 11/2017 instead of the concessional rate sought by applicant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>