<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 558 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425003</link>
    <description>The court set aside the orders of the Settlement Commission and the learned Judge, remanding the matter back to the Interim Board for fresh consideration. The Interim Board was directed to dispose of the applications within six weeks, ensuring compliance with the principles of natural justice and statutory provisions. The court emphasized that the appellants must be given sufficient opportunity to present their case and respond to any reports or findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2022 10:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 558 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425003</link>
      <description>The court set aside the orders of the Settlement Commission and the learned Judge, remanding the matter back to the Interim Board for fresh consideration. The Interim Board was directed to dispose of the applications within six weeks, ensuring compliance with the principles of natural justice and statutory provisions. The court emphasized that the appellants must be given sufficient opportunity to present their case and respond to any reports or findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>