<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 557 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425002</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the petition to quash the prosecution against the accused for alleged tax defaults under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal&#039;s decision setting aside the Appellate Authority&#039;s order restored the situation to its original state, leading to the prosecution being deemed unsustainable. The Department retained the right to pursue future action in case of non-compliance with tax liabilities by the accused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2022 21:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 557 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425002</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the petition to quash the prosecution against the accused for alleged tax defaults under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal&#039;s decision setting aside the Appellate Authority&#039;s order restored the situation to its original state, leading to the prosecution being deemed unsustainable. The Department retained the right to pursue future action in case of non-compliance with tax liabilities by the accused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>