<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 537 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424982</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer as the assessee failed to prove the identity of lender companies. The AO was instructed to determine if the loans were repaid from the assessee&#039;s funds or through additional accommodation entries. The appeal by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, with the order pronounced on 24/06/2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 07:49:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 537 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424982</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer as the assessee failed to prove the identity of lender companies. The AO was instructed to determine if the loans were repaid from the assessee&#039;s funds or through additional accommodation entries. The appeal by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, with the order pronounced on 24/06/2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>