https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424974 The court upheld the provisional attachment order under Section 24(4) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, noting the sufficiency of material supporting the "reason to believe" that the appellant was a benamidar. Emphasizing the preliminary nature of the proceedings, the court dismissed the writ appeal, directing the respondents to proceed with adjudication under Sections 25 and 26 while ensuring adherence to principles of natural justice during the adjudication process, including providing documents and the opportunity for cross-examination. en-us Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jul 2022 18:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424974 The court upheld the provisional attachment order under Section 24(4) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, noting the sufficiency of material supporting the "reason to believe" that the appellant was a benamidar. Emphasizing the preliminary nature of the proceedings, the court dismissed the writ appeal, directing the respondents to proceed with adjudication under Sections 25 and 26 while ensuring adherence to principles of natural justice during the adjudication process, including providing documents and the opportunity for cross-examination. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424974