https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424966 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and confirming their right to Cenvat credit on capital goods. The appellant's finished goods were deemed dutiable under the Central Excise Tariff Act, not falling under the exemption criteria of Rule 6(4) of CCR. The Tribunal considered the show cause notice as mis-conceived, setting aside the previous order and granting consequential benefits to the appellant in accordance with the law. en-us Tue, 12 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Jun 2023 11:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424966 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and confirming their right to Cenvat credit on capital goods. The appellant's finished goods were deemed dutiable under the Central Excise Tariff Act, not falling under the exemption criteria of Rule 6(4) of CCR. The Tribunal considered the show cause notice as mis-conceived, setting aside the previous order and granting consequential benefits to the appellant in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424966