<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 518 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424963</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the revision petition due to the appellant&#039;s non-appearance and delay, emphasizing the need for diligence in prosecuting the matter. While agreeing with the assessment of the appellant&#039;s conduct, the Court differed on the relief to be granted, expressing concerns about revenue interests affected by prolonged litigation. The appellant&#039;s argument on limitation was not entertained, stressing the importance of raising legal issues at the appropriate stage. The Court directed the appellant to pay 50% of the net tax payable under the C.S.T. Act within a specified time frame, aiming to balance revenue interests and the appellant&#039;s rights. Compliance conditions were set, treating the amount as a deposit subject to further orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 07:47:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 518 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424963</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the revision petition due to the appellant&#039;s non-appearance and delay, emphasizing the need for diligence in prosecuting the matter. While agreeing with the assessment of the appellant&#039;s conduct, the Court differed on the relief to be granted, expressing concerns about revenue interests affected by prolonged litigation. The appellant&#039;s argument on limitation was not entertained, stressing the importance of raising legal issues at the appropriate stage. The Court directed the appellant to pay 50% of the net tax payable under the C.S.T. Act within a specified time frame, aiming to balance revenue interests and the appellant&#039;s rights. Compliance conditions were set, treating the amount as a deposit subject to further orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>