https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424962 The Supreme Court upheld the Calcutta High Court's decision to grant bail to the respondent, emphasizing the reasonable interpretation of facts and law. The Court found no material evidence supporting charges under Section 27A of the NDPS Act and raised doubts about the prosecution's case, particularly regarding conspiracy and financing illicit trafficking. Despite the respondent's criminal antecedents and conduct during the investigation, the Court endorsed the High Court's decision, emphasizing that observations were prima facie and would not impact the trial's final outcome. en-us Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jul 2022 07:46:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424962 The Supreme Court upheld the Calcutta High Court's decision to grant bail to the respondent, emphasizing the reasonable interpretation of facts and law. The Court found no material evidence supporting charges under Section 27A of the NDPS Act and raised doubts about the prosecution's case, particularly regarding conspiracy and financing illicit trafficking. Despite the respondent's criminal antecedents and conduct during the investigation, the Court endorsed the High Court's decision, emphasizing that observations were prima facie and would not impact the trial's final outcome. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424962