https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424961 The Supreme Court found Respondent No.3 guilty of contempt on two counts for disobeying court orders and violating restraint orders. Respondent No.3 was sentenced to four months' imprisonment and fined Rs.2,000. The Court declared transactions involving US$ 40 million void and directed repayment with interest. The Ministry of Home Affairs was tasked with securing Respondent No.3's presence for imprisonment. The decision highlights the Court's authority in enforcing compliance with its orders and upholding the rule of law. en-us Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jul 2022 17:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424961 The Supreme Court found Respondent No.3 guilty of contempt on two counts for disobeying court orders and violating restraint orders. Respondent No.3 was sentenced to four months' imprisonment and fined Rs.2,000. The Court declared transactions involving US$ 40 million void and directed repayment with interest. The Ministry of Home Affairs was tasked with securing Respondent No.3's presence for imprisonment. The decision highlights the Court's authority in enforcing compliance with its orders and upholding the rule of law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424961