<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 514 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424959</link>
    <description>The Court held that the notice of demand sent to the wrong address did not fulfill the pre-condition for filing a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. As a result, the Court quashed the complaint, ruling that no cause of action existed for the respondent to file the complaint, and the trial court should not have taken cognizance of the offence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 07:46:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 514 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424959</link>
      <description>The Court held that the notice of demand sent to the wrong address did not fulfill the pre-condition for filing a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. As a result, the Court quashed the complaint, ruling that no cause of action existed for the respondent to file the complaint, and the trial court should not have taken cognizance of the offence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>