<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 512 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424957</link>
    <description>The High Court modified the District and Sessions Judge&#039;s order, absolving the petitioner from paying the compounding fee after parties reached a compromise before the Lok Adalat. The High Court emphasized the importance of amicable resolutions and exercised discretion to adjust the order, highlighting the significance of mutual agreements in legal dispute resolution. The petition was disposed of in favor of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 512 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424957</link>
      <description>The High Court modified the District and Sessions Judge&#039;s order, absolving the petitioner from paying the compounding fee after parties reached a compromise before the Lok Adalat. The High Court emphasized the importance of amicable resolutions and exercised discretion to adjust the order, highlighting the significance of mutual agreements in legal dispute resolution. The petition was disposed of in favor of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>