<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 512 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424957</link>
    <description>In a cheque dishonour dispute under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the parties settled the matter before the Lok Adalat and the complainant confirmed receipt of the full cheque amount with no objection to compounding without a fee. On those facts, the HC held that the appellate condition requiring deposit of 20% of the cheque amount was unnecessary and could be modified. The court deleted the compounding fee condition and relieved the petitioner from depositing the amount directed by the court below.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 512 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424957</link>
      <description>In a cheque dishonour dispute under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the parties settled the matter before the Lok Adalat and the complainant confirmed receipt of the full cheque amount with no objection to compounding without a fee. On those facts, the HC held that the appellate condition requiring deposit of 20% of the cheque amount was unnecessary and could be modified. The court deleted the compounding fee condition and relieved the petitioner from depositing the amount directed by the court below.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>