<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1645 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303294</link>
    <description>The disallowance under section 14A and the addition to the book profit u/s. 115JB were both deleted by the ld. CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal. This decision was based on the absence of exempt income earned by the assessee during the relevant year and legal precedents supporting the conclusion that disallowance under section 14A should not be made if no claim for exemption is filed, and such disallowance should not be added to the book profit under section 115JB.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1645 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303294</link>
      <description>The disallowance under section 14A and the addition to the book profit u/s. 115JB were both deleted by the ld. CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal. This decision was based on the absence of exempt income earned by the assessee during the relevant year and legal precedents supporting the conclusion that disallowance under section 14A should not be made if no claim for exemption is filed, and such disallowance should not be added to the book profit under section 115JB.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>