https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303276 A tenant's entry into premises could not be treated as a contravention of the rent control order unless the foundational facts were proved, including the landlord's duty to intimate vacancy and the absence of a lawful assurance-based entry. Where no allotment order under the relevant clauses existed, the tenant could not be directed to vacate merely because he later ceased to hold an office of profit. The power to require vacation or eviction had to rest on a proper jurisdictional basis and be exercised reasonably within a reasonable time. On the stated facts, prolonged possession, rent acceptance, and delayed complaint made the eviction direction unsustainable. en-us Thu, 29 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jul 2022 14:55:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303276 A tenant's entry into premises could not be treated as a contravention of the rent control order unless the foundational facts were proved, including the landlord's duty to intimate vacancy and the absence of a lawful assurance-based entry. Where no allotment order under the relevant clauses existed, the tenant could not be directed to vacate merely because he later ceased to hold an office of profit. The power to require vacation or eviction had to rest on a proper jurisdictional basis and be exercised reasonably within a reasonable time. On the stated facts, prolonged possession, rent acceptance, and delayed complaint made the eviction direction unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 29 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303276