https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303276 The Supreme Court quashed the orders of the House Allotment Officer and the High Court, allowing the appeal and dismissing the application for eviction. The appellant was found not liable to be evicted, as the allegations of contravention of the Rent Control Order were not proven. The Court highlighted the necessity for a reasonable exercise of power and timely enforcement of the Order's provisions. en-us Thu, 29 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jul 2022 14:55:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303276 The Supreme Court quashed the orders of the House Allotment Officer and the High Court, allowing the appeal and dismissing the application for eviction. The appellant was found not liable to be evicted, as the allegations of contravention of the Rent Control Order were not proven. The Court highlighted the necessity for a reasonable exercise of power and timely enforcement of the Order's provisions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 29 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303276