<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (4) TMI 44 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29478</link>
    <description>The court held that the three individuals did not constitute an Association of Persons (AOP) and the transaction was not an adventure in the nature of trade. The notice served under section 148 was deemed invalid as it was addressed to the individuals, not the AOP. As a result, the assessment of the so-called AOP was found unnecessary, and the profit was not considered as &#039;business income&#039;. The reference was declined, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:09:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (4) TMI 44 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29478</link>
      <description>The court held that the three individuals did not constitute an Association of Persons (AOP) and the transaction was not an adventure in the nature of trade. The notice served under section 148 was deemed invalid as it was addressed to the individuals, not the AOP. As a result, the assessment of the so-called AOP was found unnecessary, and the profit was not considered as &#039;business income&#039;. The reference was declined, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>