<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (3) TMI 178 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303269</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the State Government&#039;s decision to cancel a mining lease due to non-compliance with royalty payments and conditions, rejecting arguments of waiver and estoppel against the State. The Court found that natural justice principles were adhered to during the cancellation process, providing the appellant with a fair opportunity to present their case. Additionally, the Court determined that the Central Government properly considered the revision despite mixing up breaches from different notices, affirming the decisions of the State Government, Central Government, and High Court. The appellant was granted the option to seek reconsideration from the State Government if desired.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:11:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (3) TMI 178 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303269</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the State Government&#039;s decision to cancel a mining lease due to non-compliance with royalty payments and conditions, rejecting arguments of waiver and estoppel against the State. The Court found that natural justice principles were adhered to during the cancellation process, providing the appellant with a fair opportunity to present their case. Additionally, the Court determined that the Central Government properly considered the revision despite mixing up breaches from different notices, affirming the decisions of the State Government, Central Government, and High Court. The appellant was granted the option to seek reconsideration from the State Government if desired.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>