<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 58 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29477</link>
    <description>The High Court of BOMBAY determined that the expenditure of Rs. 10,700 for drawing up a deed of lease related to business premises was a revenue expenditure and not capital in nature. Despite the 20-year lease period, the court found that the expense was necessary for conducting business and did not create an enduring asset. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the Commissioner to cover the costs of the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:50:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 58 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29477</link>
      <description>The High Court of BOMBAY determined that the expenditure of Rs. 10,700 for drawing up a deed of lease related to business premises was a revenue expenditure and not capital in nature. Despite the 20-year lease period, the court found that the expense was necessary for conducting business and did not create an enduring asset. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the Commissioner to cover the costs of the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>