<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 487 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424932</link>
    <description>The appeal for AY 2016-17 was partly allowed, directing the deletion of the disallowance of provision for expenses and reconsideration of depreciation on goodwill. For AY 2017-18, the appeal was allowed, ordering the deletion of the transfer pricing adjustment on AMP expenses. The claim for deduction of education cess was dismissed as not pressed, and the issue of the assessment order being time-barred was left undecided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 487 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424932</link>
      <description>The appeal for AY 2016-17 was partly allowed, directing the deletion of the disallowance of provision for expenses and reconsideration of depreciation on goodwill. For AY 2017-18, the appeal was allowed, ordering the deletion of the transfer pricing adjustment on AMP expenses. The claim for deduction of education cess was dismissed as not pressed, and the issue of the assessment order being time-barred was left undecided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>