<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 465 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424910</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the earlier order that classified the goods as antiquity, leading to their confiscation and penalties. The Tribunal found the adjudication order to be non-speaking, arbitrary, and contrary to its directives. As a result, the appellant was granted relief to either return or export the goods within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2022 09:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 465 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424910</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the earlier order that classified the goods as antiquity, leading to their confiscation and penalties. The Tribunal found the adjudication order to be non-speaking, arbitrary, and contrary to its directives. As a result, the appellant was granted relief to either return or export the goods within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>