<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 464 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424909</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the approval of the Resolution Plan under Section 30(6) of the I&amp;amp;B Code, 2016, emphasizing minimal judicial interference in commercial decisions of the CoC. The Appeals challenging the approval, citing lack of Operational Creditors&#039; involvement and inadequate payment, were dismissed. The Resolution Plan, compliant with legal requirements, received CoC approval and was deemed appropriate. The Tribunal affirmed the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, highlighting the importance of CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom in insolvency proceedings. The parties were directed to bear their own costs as the Appeals lacked merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2022 09:13:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 464 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424909</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the approval of the Resolution Plan under Section 30(6) of the I&amp;amp;B Code, 2016, emphasizing minimal judicial interference in commercial decisions of the CoC. The Appeals challenging the approval, citing lack of Operational Creditors&#039; involvement and inadequate payment, were dismissed. The Resolution Plan, compliant with legal requirements, received CoC approval and was deemed appropriate. The Tribunal affirmed the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, highlighting the importance of CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom in insolvency proceedings. The parties were directed to bear their own costs as the Appeals lacked merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>