https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424903 The court granted the petitioner's writ petition seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus for calling records of the impugned proceedings and interest payment on the deposited amount during the investigation. The court highlighted discrepancies in the sanctioned refund amount, the liability for service tax for a specific period, and the lack of appeal by the department affecting the petitioner's rights. It directed the second respondent to re-examine the issue, pay/adjust interest, and recover any erroneous refund within a specified timeframe after issuing a show cause notice to the petitioner. The writ petition was disposed of with the mentioned directions, without costs. en-us Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jul 2022 09:13:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424903 The court granted the petitioner's writ petition seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus for calling records of the impugned proceedings and interest payment on the deposited amount during the investigation. The court highlighted discrepancies in the sanctioned refund amount, the liability for service tax for a specific period, and the lack of appeal by the department affecting the petitioner's rights. It directed the second respondent to re-examine the issue, pay/adjust interest, and recover any erroneous refund within a specified timeframe after issuing a show cause notice to the petitioner. The writ petition was disposed of with the mentioned directions, without costs. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424903