https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424901 Writ petitions challenging orders under Central Excise law were permitted to be withdrawn and were dismissed as withdrawn, with no costs and closure of connected miscellaneous petitions. The Court noted that the petitioners had directly invoked writ jurisdiction without first approaching the statutory appellate forum, CESTAT, and observed that this was not the appropriate course, but it did not adjudicate maintainability or the merits of the impugned order. The matter was therefore disposed of solely on withdrawal, leaving the substantive challenge unresolved. en-us Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jul 2022 09:12:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424901 Writ petitions challenging orders under Central Excise law were permitted to be withdrawn and were dismissed as withdrawn, with no costs and closure of connected miscellaneous petitions. The Court noted that the petitioners had directly invoked writ jurisdiction without first approaching the statutory appellate forum, CESTAT, and observed that this was not the appropriate course, but it did not adjudicate maintainability or the merits of the impugned order. The matter was therefore disposed of solely on withdrawal, leaving the substantive challenge unresolved. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424901