https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303264 The SC allowed the appeal and set aside the Division Bench's direction to convene a review DPC and complete recruitment for 2008. The contesting respondents did not acquire any accrued or vested right to selection or promotion to OAS Class-II merely because their names were recommended under Regulation 6; the recruitment process never progressed to final selection under the 1978 Rules/Regulations. The State restructured and abolished the OAS Class-II cadre in 2009, replacing it with a new cadre, so directing appointments under the repealed scheme was contrary to law. en-us Mon, 06 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Oct 2025 16:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303264 The SC allowed the appeal and set aside the Division Bench's direction to convene a review DPC and complete recruitment for 2008. The contesting respondents did not acquire any accrued or vested right to selection or promotion to OAS Class-II merely because their names were recommended under Regulation 6; the recruitment process never progressed to final selection under the 1978 Rules/Regulations. The State restructured and abolished the OAS Class-II cadre in 2009, replacing it with a new cadre, so directing appointments under the repealed scheme was contrary to law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303264