https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10514 The Kerala statute sought to cancel arbitration clauses, revoke arbitrators' authority, extend limitation for suits, and enable the State to challenge past awards; the State defended competence under Concurrent List entries and Presidential assent, while opponents argued arbitrariness, discrimination, and encroachment on Union fields and judicial functions. The court applied pith-and-substance analysis and noted that awards made rules of court involve judicial determination; it concluded the legislation targeted concluded awards, thereby transgressing judicial power and violating separation of powers. en-us Mon, 11 Jul 2022 10:05:03 +0530 Mon, 11 Jul 2022 10:05:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10514 The Kerala statute sought to cancel arbitration clauses, revoke arbitrators' authority, extend limitation for suits, and enable the State to challenge past awards; the State defended competence under Concurrent List entries and Presidential assent, while opponents argued arbitrariness, discrimination, and encroachment on Union fields and judicial functions. The court applied pith-and-substance analysis and noted that awards made rules of court involve judicial determination; it concluded the legislation targeted concluded awards, thereby transgressing judicial power and violating separation of powers. Articles Other Topics Mon, 11 Jul 2022 10:05:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10514