https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424890 The HC set aside the rejection of petitioner's GST registration application concerning a rice mandi. The rejection order was deemed arbitrary as it lacked any reasons, violating Rule 9(4) of CGST Rules which requires written reasons for rejection. Despite proper application, acknowledgment, physical verification, and submission of a registered lease deed in response to a notice, authorities failed to provide any explanation for rejection. The court directed authorities to give the petitioner an opportunity to be heard and pass orders on the registration application within four weeks. en-us Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Apr 2025 13:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424890 The HC set aside the rejection of petitioner's GST registration application concerning a rice mandi. The rejection order was deemed arbitrary as it lacked any reasons, violating Rule 9(4) of CGST Rules which requires written reasons for rejection. Despite proper application, acknowledgment, physical verification, and submission of a registered lease deed in response to a notice, authorities failed to provide any explanation for rejection. The court directed authorities to give the petitioner an opportunity to be heard and pass orders on the registration application within four weeks. Case-Laws GST Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424890