<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 437 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424882</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of additions made by the AO regarding the recasted value of closing stock was partially allowed, remanding the issue back to the AO for verification. The CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of addition on notional interest was upheld by the Tribunal. The assessee&#039;s claim that the assessment order was barred by limitation was dismissed, confirming the order was within the prescribed period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 09:04:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 437 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424882</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of additions made by the AO regarding the recasted value of closing stock was partially allowed, remanding the issue back to the AO for verification. The CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of addition on notional interest was upheld by the Tribunal. The assessee&#039;s claim that the assessment order was barred by limitation was dismissed, confirming the order was within the prescribed period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>