<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 434 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424879</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of reassessment proceedings, ruling that they did not breach natural justice principles. Additionally, the development charges and TDR deposits received by the society were deemed non-taxable under the doctrine of mutuality. The Tribunal also rejected the ad-hoc disallowance of revenue expenses, stating that it was not warranted under the mutuality principle. As a result, the appeals of the assessee were allowed in their entirety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2022 20:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 434 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424879</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of reassessment proceedings, ruling that they did not breach natural justice principles. Additionally, the development charges and TDR deposits received by the society were deemed non-taxable under the doctrine of mutuality. The Tribunal also rejected the ad-hoc disallowance of revenue expenses, stating that it was not warranted under the mutuality principle. As a result, the appeals of the assessee were allowed in their entirety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>