<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 433 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424878</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by upholding the reopening of the assessment under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. However, it directed the deletion of the addition of Rs. 41 lakhs under Section 68, as the assessee provided sufficient evidence to establish the genuineness of the transactions. The initiation of penalty proceedings under Sections 234B, 234C, 234D, and 271(1)(C) was dismissed due to the deletion of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 433 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424878</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by upholding the reopening of the assessment under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. However, it directed the deletion of the addition of Rs. 41 lakhs under Section 68, as the assessee provided sufficient evidence to establish the genuineness of the transactions. The initiation of penalty proceedings under Sections 234B, 234C, 234D, and 271(1)(C) was dismissed due to the deletion of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>