https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424866 The appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure was dismissed by the Appellate Court. The Court set aside the conviction and sentence under Section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as the respondent successfully rebutted the presumptions under Section 139 of the Act. The evidence presented did not sufficiently support the appellant's claims, and the respondent's defense, including reporting the loss of cheques and harassment complaints, weakened the appellant's case. The Appellate Court's decision was based on a thorough analysis of the evidence and upheld legal principles regarding the burden of proof in such cases. en-us Fri, 08 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Jul 2022 09:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424866 The appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure was dismissed by the Appellate Court. The Court set aside the conviction and sentence under Section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as the respondent successfully rebutted the presumptions under Section 139 of the Act. The evidence presented did not sufficiently support the appellant's claims, and the respondent's defense, including reporting the loss of cheques and harassment complaints, weakened the appellant's case. The Appellate Court's decision was based on a thorough analysis of the evidence and upheld legal principles regarding the burden of proof in such cases. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424866