https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424858 A stock auditor seeking bail in a second application was granted relief because his role was limited to auditing on the basis of company-supplied records, he had cooperated with the investigation and remained available before the investigating agency and the trial court, and his custody had not been sought during the investigation or after the complaint. The allegations were framed mainly as negligence in not detecting stock discrepancies, while the principal accused had already obtained interim bail. On these facts, the Court held that continued incarceration was not warranted and admitted him to bail, subject to furnishing bail and surety bonds, without finding the restrictions in section 212(6) decisive against release. en-us Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Jul 2022 09:03:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424858 A stock auditor seeking bail in a second application was granted relief because his role was limited to auditing on the basis of company-supplied records, he had cooperated with the investigation and remained available before the investigating agency and the trial court, and his custody had not been sought during the investigation or after the complaint. The allegations were framed mainly as negligence in not detecting stock discrepancies, while the principal accused had already obtained interim bail. On these facts, the Court held that continued incarceration was not warranted and admitted him to bail, subject to furnishing bail and surety bonds, without finding the restrictions in section 212(6) decisive against release. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424858