<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 412 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424857</link>
    <description>Where multiple cheque dishonour prosecutions arise from a consolidated liability and are tried on the same evidence, substantive sentences may be directed to run concurrently under Section 427 CrPC. The court treated the complaints as part of one transaction because the cheques were issued in close succession against the same liability, and the linked circumstances justified concurrent punishment. In revisional jurisdiction, a compensation order under Section 357 CrPC may also be modified to include a default sentence for non-payment, so that the direction remains enforceable. The default term was fixed within statutory limits and made consecutive to the substantive sentence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 10:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 412 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424857</link>
      <description>Where multiple cheque dishonour prosecutions arise from a consolidated liability and are tried on the same evidence, substantive sentences may be directed to run concurrently under Section 427 CrPC. The court treated the complaints as part of one transaction because the cheques were issued in close succession against the same liability, and the linked circumstances justified concurrent punishment. In revisional jurisdiction, a compensation order under Section 357 CrPC may also be modified to include a default sentence for non-payment, so that the direction remains enforceable. The default term was fixed within statutory limits and made consecutive to the substantive sentence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>