https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303241 Despite the stringent bail restriction in Section 212(6) of the Companies Act, 2013, prolonged pre-trial custody and a slow-moving prosecution can justify bail to protect personal liberty where trial is unlikely to conclude within a reasonable time. The Court also treated the appellant's role as distinct from that of the main accused and noted the large number of accused and continuing delay in proceedings. On those facts, continued detention was not warranted, and release on bail on terms fixed by the Special Judge was ordered. en-us Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 10 Jul 2022 20:20:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303241 Despite the stringent bail restriction in Section 212(6) of the Companies Act, 2013, prolonged pre-trial custody and a slow-moving prosecution can justify bail to protect personal liberty where trial is unlikely to conclude within a reasonable time. The Court also treated the appellant's role as distinct from that of the main accused and noted the large number of accused and continuing delay in proceedings. On those facts, continued detention was not warranted, and release on bail on terms fixed by the Special Judge was ordered. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303241