<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 395 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424840</link>
    <description>The Tribunal deemed the notice issued under section 148 as time-barred and invalid, leading to the unsustainable addition of Rs.6,49,177. The Tribunal also found procedural irregularities in the assessment order and demand notice, ultimately deleting the unexplained cash credit additions of Rs. 8,97,200. Additionally, the Tribunal held the direction to initiate penalty proceedings as bad in law. Despite the appellant&#039;s concern about not receiving a hard copy of the order under section 250, the Tribunal primarily focused on the Assessing Officer&#039;s improper additions without assessing the reopened income, resulting in the appeal being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2022 08:03:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 395 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424840</link>
      <description>The Tribunal deemed the notice issued under section 148 as time-barred and invalid, leading to the unsustainable addition of Rs.6,49,177. The Tribunal also found procedural irregularities in the assessment order and demand notice, ultimately deleting the unexplained cash credit additions of Rs. 8,97,200. Additionally, the Tribunal held the direction to initiate penalty proceedings as bad in law. Despite the appellant&#039;s concern about not receiving a hard copy of the order under section 250, the Tribunal primarily focused on the Assessing Officer&#039;s improper additions without assessing the reopened income, resulting in the appeal being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>