<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 387 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424832</link>
    <description>A survey statement alone is not conclusive where the assessee produces substantive evidence of genuine share transactions, including demat records, merger-based allotment, sale through authorised brokers, and securities transaction tax payment. On that record, long-term capital gains exemption on the share sale was accepted because the revenue failed to show a colourable device or independent material discrediting the claim. The same transaction also could not be recharacterised as adventure in the nature of trade or as short-term capital gains arising from the merger, as no trading intention or statutory basis for that treatment was established. The revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2022 08:02:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 387 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424832</link>
      <description>A survey statement alone is not conclusive where the assessee produces substantive evidence of genuine share transactions, including demat records, merger-based allotment, sale through authorised brokers, and securities transaction tax payment. On that record, long-term capital gains exemption on the share sale was accepted because the revenue failed to show a colourable device or independent material discrediting the claim. The same transaction also could not be recharacterised as adventure in the nature of trade or as short-term capital gains arising from the merger, as no trading intention or statutory basis for that treatment was established. The revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>