<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 379 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424824</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. It upheld the disallowance of 50% of employee benefit expenses and other expenses due to lack of supporting documents and significant rental use of the property. However, it remitted the disallowance under Section 14A back to the AO for re-computation following the High Court&#039;s decision in a relevant case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 379 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424824</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. It upheld the disallowance of 50% of employee benefit expenses and other expenses due to lack of supporting documents and significant rental use of the property. However, it remitted the disallowance under Section 14A back to the AO for re-computation following the High Court&#039;s decision in a relevant case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>