<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 376 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424821</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rectified errors in its initial order by acknowledging that borrowed funds were used for the CGDA scheme, not mutual funds. It clarified that interest paid on these funds could not be deducted from interest earned under section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The appeals&#039; outcome remained unchanged, with the judgment pronounced on May 13, 2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 20:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 376 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424821</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rectified errors in its initial order by acknowledging that borrowed funds were used for the CGDA scheme, not mutual funds. It clarified that interest paid on these funds could not be deducted from interest earned under section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The appeals&#039; outcome remained unchanged, with the judgment pronounced on May 13, 2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>