<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (3) TMI 7 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29451</link>
    <description>The Tribunal justified canceling the penalty imposed by the ITO due to the assessee&#039;s reasonable cause for delayed payment of self-assessment tax. The court clarified that penalties under Section 140A(3) are at the ITO&#039;s discretion, emphasizing the need for a case-by-case assessment. It affirmed the binding nature of CBDT circulars on the ITO, supporting the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The outcome favored the assessee, with the department ordered to pay costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:17:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (3) TMI 7 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29451</link>
      <description>The Tribunal justified canceling the penalty imposed by the ITO due to the assessee&#039;s reasonable cause for delayed payment of self-assessment tax. The court clarified that penalties under Section 140A(3) are at the ITO&#039;s discretion, emphasizing the need for a case-by-case assessment. It affirmed the binding nature of CBDT circulars on the ITO, supporting the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The outcome favored the assessee, with the department ordered to pay costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>