<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1521 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303227</link>
    <description>In multiple cheque-dishonour prosecutions, the High Court recognised that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC may be used to direct concurrent running of substantive sentences under Section 427 CrPC, depending on the facts, the nature and number of cases, and the interests of criminal justice. Applying that discretion, it found no compelling reason to insist on consecutive operation of all substantive sentences in the 14 cases. The benefit of concurrency was confined to substantive imprisonment and did not extend to default sentences imposed for non-payment of fine or compensation, which would continue to operate consecutively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2022 08:00:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1521 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303227</link>
      <description>In multiple cheque-dishonour prosecutions, the High Court recognised that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC may be used to direct concurrent running of substantive sentences under Section 427 CrPC, depending on the facts, the nature and number of cases, and the interests of criminal justice. Applying that discretion, it found no compelling reason to insist on consecutive operation of all substantive sentences in the 14 cases. The benefit of concurrency was confined to substantive imprisonment and did not extend to default sentences imposed for non-payment of fine or compensation, which would continue to operate consecutively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>