<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (1) TMI 44 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29448</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh ruled in favor of the assessee-firm, allowing the continuation of registration for the assessment year 1973-74. The court determined that the firm&#039;s activities, involving exploiting a forest block under a perpetual lease and selling forest produce, qualified as a business under the Income Tax Act. Emphasizing the intent behind the transactions and citing relevant precedents, the court held that the partnership was actively engaged in a business activity assessable under section 28 of the Act. The court distinguished the case from instances of leasing assets post-trading cessation, ultimately deciding in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:07:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (1) TMI 44 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29448</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh ruled in favor of the assessee-firm, allowing the continuation of registration for the assessment year 1973-74. The court determined that the firm&#039;s activities, involving exploiting a forest block under a perpetual lease and selling forest produce, qualified as a business under the Income Tax Act. Emphasizing the intent behind the transactions and citing relevant precedents, the court held that the partnership was actively engaged in a business activity assessable under section 28 of the Act. The court distinguished the case from instances of leasing assets post-trading cessation, ultimately deciding in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>