<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1605 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303215</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of on the basis of the respondent&#039;s undertaking, with the interim arrangement continued until disposal of the main company petition. The NCLAT also directed that a reply be filed before the NCLT, leaving the substantive dispute to be addressed in the pending company proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 19:19:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1605 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303215</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of on the basis of the respondent&#039;s undertaking, with the interim arrangement continued until disposal of the main company petition. The NCLAT also directed that a reply be filed before the NCLT, leaving the substantive dispute to be addressed in the pending company proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>