https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303198 A society named in the joint development agreement and connected power of attorney was treated as the contracting party, so its application under section 11 for appointment of an arbitrator was maintainable. Allegations that the agreement contained unfair terms or that the signatory lacked authority went to the validity of the principal contract, not to the existence of the arbitration clause, which remained separable and enforceable. The Court upheld appointment of the arbitrator and left issues on the contract's validity to arbitration. en-us Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Jul 2022 09:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303198 A society named in the joint development agreement and connected power of attorney was treated as the contracting party, so its application under section 11 for appointment of an arbitrator was maintainable. Allegations that the agreement contained unfair terms or that the signatory lacked authority went to the validity of the principal contract, not to the existence of the arbitration clause, which remained separable and enforceable. The Court upheld appointment of the arbitrator and left issues on the contract's validity to arbitration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303198