https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424790 The HC dismissed the anticipatory bail petition in an FIR involving fraud charges under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120-B IPC. Though not directly named in the FIR, evidence showed mobile numbers and bank accounts linked to the petitioner were used in tax evasion schemes. The court noted the petitioner had evaded arrest for three years, failed to cooperate with investigators despite previous interim bail, and was allegedly the mastermind behind fraudulent activities conducted under his nephew's name. Given the serious allegations of money laundering and tax fraud, bail was denied. en-us Tue, 05 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Apr 2025 11:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424790 The HC dismissed the anticipatory bail petition in an FIR involving fraud charges under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120-B IPC. Though not directly named in the FIR, evidence showed mobile numbers and bank accounts linked to the petitioner were used in tax evasion schemes. The court noted the petitioner had evaded arrest for three years, failed to cooperate with investigators despite previous interim bail, and was allegedly the mastermind behind fraudulent activities conducted under his nephew's name. Given the serious allegations of money laundering and tax fraud, bail was denied. Case-Laws GST Tue, 05 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424790