https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424788 The HC disposed of the writ petition seeking direction to consider an application under Section 140(5) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017. The petitioner sought input tax credit for extended days, which was disallowed for 20 invoices totaling Rs.23,71,301. The court directed the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation within three weeks and communicate the outcome, while clarifying that the pendency of this representation would not prevent the second respondent from proceeding with the show cause notice. en-us Fri, 01 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Apr 2025 12:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424788 The HC disposed of the writ petition seeking direction to consider an application under Section 140(5) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017. The petitioner sought input tax credit for extended days, which was disallowed for 20 invoices totaling Rs.23,71,301. The court directed the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation within three weeks and communicate the outcome, while clarifying that the pendency of this representation would not prevent the second respondent from proceeding with the show cause notice. Case-Laws GST Fri, 01 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424788