<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 334 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424779</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision that ISO Certification expenditure should be treated as revenue expenditure and the subsidy received by the assessee as capital in nature. The Court found that both expenses did not enhance fixed capital but rather facilitated business operations and were for infrastructure upgradation, respectively. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial legal question was identified for further consideration under Section 260A of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 334 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424779</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision that ISO Certification expenditure should be treated as revenue expenditure and the subsidy received by the assessee as capital in nature. The Court found that both expenses did not enhance fixed capital but rather facilitated business operations and were for infrastructure upgradation, respectively. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial legal question was identified for further consideration under Section 260A of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>