<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 318 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424763</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the jurisdiction of DRI to issue the show cause notice and the transfer of the notice to the call book. The court found the petition not maintainable due to the petitioner not challenging the validity of the notification directing cases to be kept pending. The judgment emphasizes the importance of challenging relevant notifications for the maintainability of such petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 318 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424763</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the jurisdiction of DRI to issue the show cause notice and the transfer of the notice to the call book. The court found the petition not maintainable due to the petitioner not challenging the validity of the notification directing cases to be kept pending. The judgment emphasizes the importance of challenging relevant notifications for the maintainability of such petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>